Skip to content

LCORE-2295: Quota limiter configuration unit tests#1839

Merged
tisnik merged 1 commit into
lightspeed-core:mainfrom
tisnik:lcore-2295-quota-limiter-configuration-unit-tests
Jun 3, 2026
Merged

LCORE-2295: Quota limiter configuration unit tests#1839
tisnik merged 1 commit into
lightspeed-core:mainfrom
tisnik:lcore-2295-quota-limiter-configuration-unit-tests

Conversation

@tisnik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tisnik tisnik commented Jun 3, 2026

Description

LCORE-2295: Quota limiter configuration unit tests

Type of change

  • Refactor
  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • CVE fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update
  • Configuration Update
  • Bump-up service version
  • Bump-up dependent library
  • Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
  • CI configuration change
  • Konflux configuration change
  • Unit tests improvement
  • Integration tests improvement
  • End to end tests improvement
  • Benchmarks improvement

Tools used to create PR

  • Assisted-by: N/A
  • Generated by: N/A

Related Tickets & Documents

  • Related Issue #LCORE-2295

Summary by CodeRabbit

Tests

  • Enhanced test coverage for quota limiter configuration validation with additional negative test cases to ensure proper error handling and validation of invalid configurations.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a016c572-8b04-45e2-9dc2-1d3067cab48c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6738771 and 746b638.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/unit/models/config/test_quota_limiter_config.py
📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)
  • GitHub Check: build-pr
  • GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci / group 1
  • GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci / group 3
  • GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci / group 2
  • GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci / group 1
  • GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci / group 3
  • GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci / group 2
  • GitHub Check: E2E Tests for Lightspeed Evaluation job
  • GitHub Check: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / lightspeed-stack-on-pull-request
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
tests/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

tests/**/*.py: Use pytest for all unit and integration tests; do not use unittest
Use pytest.mark.asyncio marker for async tests

Files:

  • tests/unit/models/config/test_quota_limiter_config.py
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/unit/models/config/test_quota_limiter_config.py (1)

319-409: LGTM!


Walkthrough

This PR extends the quota limiter configuration test suite by adding negative test cases. It introduces an incorrect_configurations fixture containing various invalid configuration dictionaries and a parametrized test that verifies each configuration raises a ValueError during QuotaLimiterConfiguration instantiation.

Changes

Quota Limiter Negative Case Testing

Layer / File(s) Summary
Invalid configuration test fixture and validation
tests/unit/models/config/test_quota_limiter_config.py
incorrect_configurations list provides invalid config dictionaries with wrong types, None fields, and non-numeric values; parametrized test test_configure_quota_handlers_from_dict_negative_cases verifies each raises ValueError matching "validation error".

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding unit tests for quota limiter configuration, which directly matches the PR's focus on test improvements.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@tisnik tisnik merged commit fee0f77 into lightspeed-core:main Jun 3, 2026
36 of 37 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant