Skip to content

fix: correct processingCheckRetry typo to processingCheckRetries#1635

Closed
dar1en (franko-c) wants to merge 1 commit into
contentful:mainfrom
franko-c:fix/retry-limit-param-typo
Closed

fix: correct processingCheckRetry typo to processingCheckRetries#1635
dar1en (franko-c) wants to merge 1 commit into
contentful:mainfrom
franko-c:fix/retry-limit-param-typo

Conversation

@franko-c
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes #1632

Summary

lib/tasks/push-to-space/assets.ts:70 passes retryLimit under the key processingCheckRetry, but the Contentful Management SDK expects processingCheckRetries (plural). one-character typo that causes the retry limit to be silently ignored during asset processing.

Changes

  • lib/tasks/push-to-space/assets.ts: processingCheckRetryprocessingCheckRetries

Verification

targeted harness confirmed the fix — baseline (singular form) fails, patched (plural form) passes.

Fixes contentful#1632

The retryLimit option was silently ignored because it was passed
under the wrong key name (processingCheckRetry instead of
processingCheckRetries). Single-character fix.
@franko-c dar1en (franko-c) requested a review from a team as a code owner May 24, 2026 02:34
@franko-c
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

thanks ethan ozelius (@ethan-ozelius-contentful) — closing since the typo fix shipped in #1638 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] retryLimit is silently ignored due to parameter name typo, causing indefinite hangs on asset processing

1 participant