Skip to content

Add CodeQL workflow#22

Merged
williammartin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
wm-codeql
May 20, 2026
Merged

Add CodeQL workflow#22
williammartin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
wm-codeql

Conversation

@williammartin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@williammartin williammartin commented May 20, 2026

Adds a CodeQL code scanning workflow covering Go source and GitHub Actions.

  • Matrix scans go and actions.
  • Uses security-and-quality queries.
  • Runs on push/PR to main (docs-only PR changes skipped) and weekly on Sunday.

Co-authored-by: Copilot 223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@williammartin williammartin marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2026 14:47
@williammartin williammartin requested a review from a team as a code owner May 20, 2026 14:47
@williammartin williammartin requested review from babakks and Copilot May 20, 2026 14:47
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a GitHub Actions CodeQL code scanning workflow to run security-and-quality queries for both Go code and GitHub Actions workflow content.

Changes:

  • Introduces a new .github/workflows/codeql.yml workflow with a language matrix (go, actions).
  • Triggers scanning on push/PR to main (ignoring **/*.md changes on PRs) and on a weekly schedule.
  • Configures minimal required permissions for SARIF upload to GitHub code scanning.
Show a summary per file
File Description
.github/workflows/codeql.yml Adds the CodeQL workflow configuration for Go and GitHub Actions scanning.

Copilot's findings

Tip

Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1

Comment thread .github/workflows/codeql.yml
@williammartin williammartin merged commit fc15383 into main May 20, 2026
15 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants